![]() ![]()
In October 1761 a man named Shann was convicted of attempted sodomy and was sentenced to stand in the pillory in Cheapside. The printseller Thomas Ewart who had a shop in the Strand near Charing Cross, saw an opportunity and published a broadside ballad designed to be sold to the spectators. However, in the event, Shann appealed to have his sentence changed to transportation for life, and this was granted. So in fact he never stood in the pillory, and the event described in the broadside ballad never took place. The nineteenth-century collector Edward Hawkins collected the only extant copy of the ballad, and in his handwriting on this copy he referred to a sodomite killed in the pillory in Stratford in April 1763 (see Newsreports for 1763). Hawkins mistakenly thought the ballad was published in 1763 and referred to the 1763 incident. The broadside ballad was exhibited in the British Library's "London 1753" exhibition in 2003, and although the catalogue entry points out that it was published in October 1762, it mistakenly identifies the incident with an incident in October 1761 when a sodomite was brutally beaten while in the Cheapside pillory (see Newsreports for 1761). The following newspaper reports make it clear that the ballad concerns the sodomite Shann in October 1762, and that the planned pillorying never took place.
Saturday, 9 October 1762 Nor Knave, nor Fool, but, from unlucky Time, To be had of T. Ewart, at the Beehive in the Strand, and of all the Printsellers in Great Britain and Ireland. 14-16 October 1762 Postscript. On Monday next Mr. Shann, some Time since convicted of an Attempt to commit a detestable Crime, will stand on the Pillory near the Conduit in Cheapside. (St. James's Chronicle) 15-18 October 1762 Postscript [18 October]. The fellow for an attempt of a most atrocious nature did not stand in the pillory in Cheapside this day, as mentioned in a morning paper; many idle people attended, who met with disappointment. (Lloyd's Evening Post)18-20 October 1762 Postscript [20 October]. We are informed that the person who was to have stood in the pillory for an atrocious crime, has petitioned to be transported for life, which it is said will be granted. (Lloyd's Evening Post) The ballad is printed on a single sheet of paper, at the top of which is an illustration showing the molly standing in the pillory, surrounded by a mob preparing to throw rubbish at him. The women have speech-balloons with the following words: "Flogg him." "Here's a fair Mark." "Cut it off." "Shave him close." A woman with a basket of pears says "Take This Buggume Pear." The molly is depicted as saying: "I am now in the Hole, indeed come all in my Friends." He is referring to the uppermost hole in the pillory through which he pokes his head, but there is of course a pun upon the lowermost "hole," and, later in the poem, a pun upon "backward," i.e. the backside or buttocks. Every quatrain ends with the emphasized word "Right," which may be a topical pun upon someone's name (i.e. Wright). I don't know if it's a direct influence, but the Epilogue to Arthur Murphy's play All in the Wrong, which opened at Drury Lane on 15 June 1761, has refrain ending "... all in the wrong" except for the last repeat of the refrain, which changes to: "And our note we will change to 'You're all in the right.'" Rictor Norton
![]()
|